Brace Related Stress In Scoliosis Patients Comparison Of Different Concepts Of Bracing

Background
The BSSQbrace questionnaire has been shown to be reliable with good internal consistency and reproducibility estimating the stress scoliosis patients have whilst wearing their brace. Eight questions are provided focussing on this topic. A max. score of 24 can be achieved (from 0 for most stress to 24 for no stress). The subdivision of the score values is: 0-8 (strong stress), 9-16 (medium stress) and 17-24 (little stress).

Study design
Two BSSQbrace questionnaires have been posted to 65 patients under brace treatment from our Cheneau light data base. All patients had another kind of brace prior to the Cheneau light. The patients have been asked to rate their stress level using one questionnaire for the current brace and the other for the previous one.

Results
63 Patients (59 girls and 4 boys) returned their fully completed questionnaires (average age 13,6 years, average Cobb angle 43,7 degrees). Stress level in the previous brace was 11,04 and in the Cheneau light® 13,87. The differences were highly significant in the t-test; t = -4,67; p < 0,001.

Conclusion
The use of the Cheneau light® brace leads to reduced stress and/or impairment for the patients under treatment compared to heavier brace models used so far.

Background
Quality of life seems to be an important issue for patients with scoliosis^1,2. Therefore a new instrument has been developed by two physicians and two psychologists working at our centre, to assess the psychological stress scoliosis patients have because of their deformity³. This instrument is called the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire (BSSQ). 8 questions are provided focussing on this topic. The response to each question is scored 0 (most stress) to 3 (least stress). A max. score values of 24 can be achieved.

The following items have been provided:

Not only scoliosis itself but also conservative treatment may contribute to a decreased quality of life. The impact of the treatment procedures, especially with respect to brace treatment (Fig. 1) on quality of life has not been investigated with special questionnaires until 2005, when the first attempts where undertaken to focus on the problems adolescents might have because of brace wearing^4-6.

Derived from the BSSQ, a questionnaire was developed to estimate the psychological stress adolescent scoliosis patients have because of the brace they wear. This BSSQ brace questionnaire has already been tested previously^4,5.

As reported in a previous study, in brace the patients seem to have more stress than just because of their deformity. The in-brace values of the BSSQbrace showed to be lower than the out-brace values related to deformity⁵.

In a series of AIS brace patients the BSSQ brace questionnaire has shown to have a good score distribution, and to be internally consistent and reproducible⁷. It can be used to measure the coping strategies a patient uses and the impairment a patient feels to have, whilst wearing a brace.

Different bracing concepts are used today for the treatment of scoliosis. The plaster cast method worldwide seems to be the most practiced technique at the moment. CAD (Computer Aided Design) systems are on the market which allow brace adjustments without plaster^8,9. The latest development however, is the use of the ScoliOlogiC™ off the shelf system enabling the orthopedic technician to construct a light brace (Fig. 1) for scoliosis correction from a variety of pattern specific shells to be connected to an anterior and a posterior upright^9,10. This Chêneau light® brace, developed according to the Chêneau principles, promises a reduced impediment of quality of life in the brace. To investigate as to whether our hypothesis is right that brace related stress in this brace is less than for other braces, this study has been performed.

Methods
Two BSSQ brace questionnaires have been posted to 65 patients under brace treatment from our Cheneau light data base. All patients had another kind of brace prior to the Cheneau light and because of that were experienced brace users for at least 6 months. The patients have been asked to rate their stress level using one questionnaire for the current brace and the other for the previous one. The Student’s t-test for dependent samples was performed using Winstat® Software in order to test the hypothesis that the BSSQbrace values rated by the patients are different for the different braces used.

Of the 63 patients (59 girls and 4 boys) returning the questionnaire 58 had some Chêneau brace or modification before the Chêneau light® has been adjusted (31 from outside and 27 from one of the two bracing companies serving our center), 1 wore a Boston brace, 2 a so called Chêneau-Boston-Wiesbaden brace, 1 a Wilmington brace and 1 a SpineCor.

Figure 1: Two braces for one patient. This 14 year old girl with 33° thoracolumbar was not able to wear her initially prescribed Chêneau modification more than 4 hrs./day because of heavy pain for more than 4 months. A new Chêneau light® has been prescribed with similar in-brace correction (of more than 60%) not causing pain anymore. The reduction of material is clearly visible. The BSSQbrace was 5 in her initial brace and 22 in the Chêneau light® brace.

Figure 2: Overcorrection of a thoracic curve from 38° to – 14° in a 11 year old premenarchial girl treated with a T2 „Chêneau light®” model. After 2 years of treatment she has 19° without brace and looks quite compensated in the scans.

Results
63 Patients returned their fully completed questionnaires. Average age was 13.6 years (Range 10 – 17 years; SD 1.4), average Cobb angle 43,7 degrees (Range 17 – 75°; SD 16.1). Stress level in the previous brace was 11.04 (Range 1 – 23; SD 5.7) and in the Cheneau light 13.87 (Range 4 – 24; SD 5.3). The differences were highly significant in the t-test; t = -4.67; p < 0.001.

The BSSQbrace results for the individual questions comparing the previous brace with the Chêneau light® brace are documented in Table 1.

Three immature patients had curvatures of less than 20° before being braced repeatedly, but they all had curvatures of more than 20° at the start of their treatment.

Discussion
Braces in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) treatment seem to produce stress^11-14, however there is controversy whether health related quality of life issues of brace treated adolescents are affected negatively^1,13,15,16. AIS has to be regarded as a chronic condition that affects the body configuration of the adolescent, consequently leading to alterations in lifestyle. The impact of the brace to the self and body image of the adolescent is reported as the main contributory factor for stress production^18-26.

Today there is evidence that brace treatment enabled to prevent curve progression^8,17-20 and help to reduce the prevalence of surgery^21,22, but even more than that. Modern bracing concepts clearly do have an impact on the clinical appearance of the patient^23-26. Even if a curve may progress sometimes under a certain brace treatment clinical appearance may improve drastically²⁶. Usually, however, the clinical improvement comes along with an improvement of Cobb angle (Fig. 2)^23-26. Clinical improvements have been found achievable in the normal range of bracing indications with curves less than 45°²⁷ but also in curves bigger than that²⁸. We do know that compliance is crucial to the outcome of brace treatment²⁹ and that there are ways to improve compliance. One way to improve is certainly using the appropriate psychological intervention. If the physician is not convinced that braces do work, so how can he instruct and guide the patient properly? How can the patient believe being braced should be worthwhile? How can even a prospective randomized study on bracing only including so called “non-believers”²⁹ lead to a conclusion other than: “The brace does not work!” As Landauer³⁰ recently has pointed out: “Failure has one name: Physician!”

Therefore it is essential to ease the psychological burdon the patient has to bear, by using the appropriate psychological intervention for a patient under brace treatment, a conservative specialist in this field has to have the appropriate skills for.

The other way to improve compliance according to this study may be the reduction of material, in other words: “Make the braces smaller!” When patients experience less stress in the brace we may assume that compliance improves. At this very moment this of course is only an unproven assumption and we are not able to provide enough data on brace wearing times. However in the near future we will look at the relation of reported/prescribed brace wearing times more closely which are introduced into our prospective Chêneau light® database.

Interestingly not only the usual hard braces have been found to induce more stress than the Chêneau light®, but also one patient under SpineCor treatment reported to have more stress in the SpineCor than while wearing the Chêneau light® (Fig. 3). In this case, however, it was surely not the material reduction but the compression experienced and the impairment of breathing felt by the patient. However this is not very common in patients under SpineCor treatment³¹.

It certainly would have been interesting to compare the different brace types with the help of the BSSQbrace questionnaire, however there were only few braces other than Chêneau types in this study and therefore not enough numbers to make a statistical comparison or to draw conclusions. Furthermore there is a great variety in the quality of the different braces also in the Chêneau group which makes it hard to compare different braces just on the basis of the braces names.

Boston or Wilmington braces are well recognised in international literature, however the Chêneau-Boston-Wiesbaden brace (CBW) is not known internationally. Therefore I would like to demonstrate a CBW brace on figure 4 just to give an example. The brace on figure 4 however is not the brace of a patient from this study.

Figure 3: Patient feels very tired in the SpineCor adjusted in Switzerland (Middle left) because she recognised much axial load and has difficulties to breath! No change of decompensation with 41° without and 43° in the SpineCor. Middle right: Try on brace recompensating to the middle and on the right “ready to show” the final form showing a clear overcompensation to the left. The patient feels less stressed in this brace than in the SpineCor she was treated with before: BSSQbrace SpineCor 7 and BSSQbrace Chêneau light® 10.

Figure 4: CBW (Chêneau Boston Wiesbaden) brace combining the application of some Chêneau pressure areas with the Boston style brace which is being closed dorsally. The left picture shows the rear view, the middle the side view and the right picture the front view.

Conclusion
The use of the Chêneau light brace leads to reduced stress and/or impairment for the patients under treatment compared to heavier brace models used so far.

More studies are needed to enlighten the different facets of compliance in order to improve strategies able to increase brace wearing time.

Competing interests
The first author is currently applying for a patent relating to the Chêneau light® brace. None of the authors has received any reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary related to the content of this paper.

Authors’ contributions
HRW: Study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, preparation of the manuscript, corresponding author. MW: Data acquisition.
CS: Data acquisition, data base.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Lesley Schneider for the translation of the original German version of the BSSQbrace into English.
The authors are thankful to Orthomed, Orthopedic devices, Bad Sobernheim, Germany, for their kind support.

1. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, Steiner A, Warschburger P, Weiss HR: Quality of Life in Women With Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine 2002, 27(4):87-91.
2. Weiss HR, Reichel D, Schanz J, Zimmermann-Gudd S: Deformity related stress in adolescents with AIS. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006, 123:347-51.
3. Botens-Helmus C, Weiss HR, Reichel D, Schanz J, Zimmermann- Gudd S: Reproducibility and criterion validity of the BSSQ-stress questionnaire for patients with scoliosis. Proceedings of the 3rd. International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities & Scientific meeting of the SOSORT, April 7th – 8th, Poznan, 2006
4. Weiss HR: How much stress do scoliosis patients have because of their brace? Proceedings of the 3rd. International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities & Scientific meeting of the SOSORT, April 7th – 8th Poznan, 2006
5. Kotwicki T, Kinel E, Strya W, Szulc A: Estimation of the stress related to conservative scoliosis therapy: an analysis based on BSSQ questionnaires. Scoliosis 2007, 2:1.
6. Vasiliadis E, Grivas TB, Gkoltsiou K: Development and preliminary validation of Brace Questionnaire: a new instrument for measuring quality of life of brace treated scoliotics. Scoliosis 2006, 1:7.
7. Botens-Helmus C, Klein R, Stephan C: The reliability of the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire (BSSQbrace) in adolescents with scoliosis during brace treatment. Scoliosis 1:22.
8. Kessler J, Bowman G: The Efficacy of a new CAD/CAM Brace in the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis. Proceedings of the 4th. International SOSORT Conference on conservative management of spinal deformities, Boston, 13/05/07
9. Weiss HR: SOSORT Instructional Lecture 2007 – The Chêneau Concept of Bracing. Proceedings of the 4th. International SOSORT Conference on conservative management of spinal deformities, Boston, 13/05/07
10. Weiss HR, Werkmann M, Stephan C: Correction effects of the ScoliOlogiC® „Chêneau light” brace in patients with scoliosis. Scoliosis 2007, 2:2.
11. Clayson D, Luz-Alterman S, Cataletto M, Levine DB: Long term psychological sequalae of surgically versus nonsurgically treated scoliosis. Spine 1984, 12(10):983-986.
12. MacLean WE, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC: Stress and Coping with scoliosis, Psychological effects on adolescents and their families.Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedic 1989, 9(3):257-261.
13. Payne WK 3rd, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD, Kane RL, Transfeldt EE, Blum RW: Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender makes a difference? Spine 1997, 22(12):1380-4.
14. Saccomani L, Vercellino F, Rizzo P, Becchetti S: Adolescents with scoliosis: psychological and psychopathological aspects. Minerva Pediatrica 1998, 50(1–2):9-14.
15. Ugwonali OF, Lomas G, Choe JC, Hyman JE, Lee FY, Vitale MG, Roye DP Jr: Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004, 4(3):254-60.
16. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL: Health- related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 2001, 10(4):278-88.
17. Hopf C, Heine J: [Long-term results of the conservative treatment of scoliosis using the Cheneau brace]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1985, 123(3):312-22.
18. Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME: The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis: Follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine 1986, 11:792-801
19. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE: Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity. Logistic regression analysis based on data from The Brace Study of the SRS. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995, 77(6):823-7.
20. Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H: Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil 2003, 6(3–4):201-7.
21. Rigo M, Reiter C, Weiss HR: Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2003, 6:209-214.
22. Maruyama T, Kitagawa T, Takeshita , Mochizuki K, Nakamura K: Effectiveness of conservative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis – a combination of brace treatment and physical treatment. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2004, 7:56.
23. Rigo M, Weiss HR: Korsettversorgungsstrategien in der Skoliosebehandlung. In Wirbelsäulendeformitäten – Konservatives Management. Edited by: Weiss HR. Pflaum, Munich; 2003.
24. Rigo M: 3D Correction of Trunk Deformity in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Chêneau Brace. In Research into Spinal Deformities 2. Edited by: Stokes IAF. IOS Press; 1999:362-365.
25. Rigo M: Radiological and cosmetic improvement 2 years after brace weaning – a case report. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2003, 6:195-199.
26. Weiss HR: Clinical improvement and radiological progression in a girl with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated conservatively – a case report. Scoliosis 2006, 1:13.
27. Kinel E, Kotwicki T, Stryla W, Szulc A: Adolescent Girls with Scoliosis Below 40 Degrees, Treated with TLSO Brace, Reveal Less Clinical Deformity than Non-treated Girls Having Similar Scoliosis Angle. Proceedings of the 4th International SOSORT Conference on conservative management of spinal deformities, Boston, 13/05/07
28. Kinel E, Kotwicki T, Stryla W, Szulc A: Adolescent Girls with Scoliosis Above 45 Degrees, Treated with TLSO Brace, Reveal Less Clinical Deformity than Non-treated Girls Having Similar Scoliosis Angle. Proceedings of the 4th International SOSORT Conference on conservative management of spinal deformities, Boston, 13/05/07
29. Thompson G: Bracing in the USA and the SRS inclusion and assessment criteria for future bracing studies. Proceedings of the 4th. International SOSORT Conference on conservative management of spinal deformities, Boston, 13/05/07
30. Landauer F, Hofstädter T: Proportion of correction and compliance to determine success in brace treatment. Proceedings of the 4th. International SOSORT Conference on conservative management of spinal deformities, Boston, 13/05/07
31. Weiss HR, Weiss G: Brace treatment during pubertal growth spurt in Girls with Idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2005, 8:199

Spinal Surgery Articles