|
Achieving Better Outcomes Without Altering Your Surgical Technique Authors: Mr Philip Sell, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon University Hospitals of Leicester and Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham Prof Gordon Waddell, Orthopaedic Surgery Dr Alison McGregor, Physiotherapy London Prof Kim Burton, Ergonomics Huddersfield |
|
Introduction Clinical outcomes of surgery for disc herniation and spinal stenosis are variable. Various surveys show that post-operative management is not uniform. Many different health care professionals interact with patients and their beliefs and views may influence patients and the expectations they have of recovery after surgery. It would appear that spinal surgeons and their patients are uncertain about what best to do post-operatively. In all care of the patient three principal streams of action should be considered: Pre-hospital care, In-hospital care and rehabilitation. The last may well be the critical factor that determines the final status of patient recovery. |
Following a focused literature review, a patient-centred, evidence-based booklet was developed. The aim was to guide post-operative management and facilitate recovery. Initial peer and patient evaluations were encouraging and the booklet (Your Back Operation www.tso.co.uk/bookshop) is currently factored into a trial investigating the post-operative management of spinal patients.
To date, 80 patients have been recruited into a randomised trial to receive the booklet. At 6 months post-surgery all of these patients are requested to complete a questionnaire on the booklet. This questionnaire contained forced-choice questions on readability, style, information level, believability, length, content and helpfulness.
Feedback is very positive. The average overall rating of the booklet was 8.6/10. Over 80% found it easy to read, interesting, and of appropriate length. Over 80% also stated they had learnt new and helpful information. All subjects stated that they would recommend the booklet to a friend, and the majority stated that they frequently referred to the booklet. The predominant messages received and understood by the patients were related to the safe benefits of early activation and return to normal activities.
It remains to be seen if the results of the study show that the booklet influences final outcome. Certainly early results show that spinal surgery patients appreciate evidence-based information in booklet form, and suggest that this booklet may be an important adjunct to post-operative management of spinal patients. In practical terms it is a well received communication that intuitively assists in patient care at very low cost.